Not sure why I'm getting downvoted for legitimate complaintsâ¦Â The fact that it doesn't continue caching images in the background makes it incredibly slow to useâ¦Â I'd actually be quite likely to use this software if this was fixedâ¦ I believe Photonic did some caching, I remember it being a much snappier piece of software. Anyway, the way flickery works right now, it simply isn't a smooth experienceâ¦ Just too much waitingâ¦
The license thing is probably less of a big deal to most, but as far as uploading goes, that is a deal-breaker in my case. But I'd still use flickery for browsing if it was just a bit more fluid and pleasantâ¦Â
reply to comment
please give us feedback | |
Advertising | FAQ.Share
Created by Arne & Marcus.
| Powered by FreeBSD, Postgres & Catalyst.