Not sure why I'm getting downvoted for legitimate complaints… The fact that it doesn't continue caching images in the background makes it incredibly slow to use… I'd actually be quite likely to use this software if this was fixed… I believe Photonic did some caching, I remember it being a much snappier piece of software. Anyway, the way flickery works right now, it simply isn't a smooth experience… Just too much waiting…

The license thing is probably less of a big deal to most, but as far as uploading goes, that is a deal-breaker in my case. But I'd still use flickery for browsing if it was just a bit more fluid and pleasant…