It's telling that the "old" iScobbler OS X client rates so much higher than the official Last.fm incarnation (currently 734 vs. 550 users). Certainly indicative of how dysfunctional of a sideways misstep many users felt the upgrade to be. I can agree with the other posters: I don't need a passive monitoring application taking up valuable Dock/Application Switcher space. And the big head scratcher? Why do I need an application, whose primary purpose is tracking my music player usage, to provide me with another music player? No thanks, I'll stick with iScobbler.
reply to comment
please give us feedback |
Advertising | FAQ.Share
Created by Arne & Marcus.
| Powered by FreeBSD, Postgres & Catalyst.