avatar autumnmistsaidthis

Comment and replies on BioX:

avatar

by
autumnmist, 2008-04-18

This is now known as eBioX
http://www.ebioinformatics.org/ebiox/

Comment and replies on Musorg:

avatar

by
autumnmist, 2007-10-21

Not many features yet, but looks promising. Needs a way to do easier mass editing of ID3 tags and rename files; in the meantime, I'm using this for freedb lookup and jTagger for tagging and renaming.

avatar

by
deadelvis, 2007-12-10

freedb lookups stopped working again :( ... anyone know of a good alternative to musorg?

avatar

by
bikefridaywalter, 2008-01-19

i wish the ui was a little bit more user friendly and that the freedb lookups worked a bit better, but at least it helps..

avatar

by
deadelvis, 2008-05-20

freedb lookups working again on new version 0.3 ... finally!! :)

Comment and replies on AppTrap:

avatar

by
autumnmist, 2007-07-07

How does this compare to AppZapper, uApp in terms of effectiveness at removing associated files?

avatar

by
factoryjoe, 2007-07-07 (score: 2)

Looks like the interaction is the inverse of AppZapper, as suggested in the description. It's a good point -- it'd be even cooler if it used AppZapper if you had it installed already.

avatar

by
brian, 2007-07-07 (score: 1)

I like it. I agree that it needs to show the app's icon, and will add that the window should be expanded to show all the files being deleted. You're deleting my stuff, after all! At least tell me which stuff it is. I don't think hiding that information should even be an option.

Also, sometimes the path gets trimmed off.

Also, no scrollbar.

Good start though.

avatar

by
alimony, 2007-07-07

brian: You can expand the window to show a list of files, just click the small arrow.

avatar

by
brian, 2007-07-07

I know, sorry. I was talking about defaults.

avatar

by
rampancy, 2007-07-08

The only major thing preventing me from installing this is the lack of distinguishing between a genuine uninstall and a Sparkle-based updating event, where the previous version of a given app is sent to the trash (as noted in the documentation).

The only thing I can think of is some kind of check for the presence of Sparkle in the app, but I wouldn't know how to implement that, or if that's even possible.

avatar

by
alimony, 2007-07-09 (score: 1)

rampancy: Checking for the existence of Sparkle in the app, as a method to detect auto-updated apps, would at the same time prevent AppTrap from actually removing those apps when you want to. This is a hard problem to solve, but it should be possible. All ideas are welcome.

avatar

by
matt, 2007-07-09

If the app has been updated with Sparkle, then surely there should be 1) the old version in the trash 2) the new version where the old one used to be? I wonder if that's an easy enough check to make programatically?

avatar

by
rickyb, 2007-07-09

I'm surprised how few people know this, but you can drag AppZapper to your Finder toolbar. When you want to delete an application you can simply drag the application onto the AppZapper icon in the toolbar and AppZapper will automatically open and show you the files to be deleted. You simply click Zap! and then close the application. This way there is only one more step than AppTrap. Granted, AppTrap is free and AppZapper is not, so I'm hoping AppTrap catches on. Nothing beats good competition!

avatar

by
rampancy, 2007-07-09

I think Matt has the right idea, actually. It might make the process slower actually, but Matt's solution sounds to me like it's the most simple one to implement (compared to any Sparkle-related stuff I might have suggested).

avatar

by
matt, 2007-07-10

@rickyb: I delete almost everything using Apple+Backspace, so the AppZapper icon solution is not good enough. It also requires closing down after you zap, so is a lot more of an interruption.

@rampancy: Yay me!

avatar

by
ric0la, 2007-09-04

I love this one! Thanks a lot! Sometimes I find myself deleting apps just for fun ;-)

avatar

by
jamesc, 2007-09-25

Just checked their website today. It appears to be gone.

avatar

by
alimony, 2007-09-25

We're having DNS problems so the website address without "www" doesn't work at the moment. Just add "www" to the address and it'll work. I've edited the links in this entry.

avatar

by
dino, 2007-11-15

I can attest to it working fine in Leopard. At least in my experience. :)

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 next

Page 1 of 7. 127 entries.