Comment and replies on Liquifile:
Cool.
Comment and replies on PocketMod:
Such a neat idea!
Is it just me, or is this app only for windows?
Works fine on Mac for me.
apparently doesn't work in OSX 10.5.3. Launch brings up Flash error message that a script is slowing it down and may hang the iMac.
Aborting the script brings up a non-functional interface screen.
Comment and replies on midimouse:
works great with Reason, and it's very easy to configure. I wish you could add modifyer keys to change even more parameters.
Awesome! Works fine with Ableton Live
Comment and replies on Vi Input Manager:
A bit late for Christmas, but an answered prayer nonetheless!
Comment and replies on Soundstream:
If "awesomest" were a word, it would desribe Soundstream
Very cool screensaver indeed. Fun to play with too (you'll see people talking extra loud while keeping an eye on the screen when it's on).
Comment and replies on Metronome:
Nicely done, Ron! You really did think of everything.
Comment and replies on Palm Desktop:
It does work with my clie - but it doesn't keep multi-day ical entries or todo categories. A small hindrance for me at this point....
It's not perfect, but at least it allows me to sync with the clie.
Comment and replies on Camino:
I recently migrated my operations to an ibook, and given I've been a firefox user for years, I just moved my stuff over and away it went. However, I found Camino to be a faster alternative, with a very similar interface to firefox. It doesn't have all the bells & whistles, but I've found Camino to be reliable, fast, and I have yet to find a page that doesn't work with it.
I dont get how camino is better than safari or firefox for that matter. It looks bad, compared to firefox OR safari and is not faster than either (in my opinion, I may be wrong). Seems like you have to download 4 plugins to make it even half usable. Can someone exsplain the apeal of camino now that firefox 2.0 is out?
Well, looks are pretty subjective. In my opinion, Camino's unified theme looks considerably better than Safari's aging brushed metal appearance. And in terms of usability, I find it's just as good as Safari in that area. Although it most definitely isn't as extensible as Firefox, I find that's not necessarily needed. For some simple, solid browsing, Camino does the job quite well. Although, I still prefer Safari. :)
Camino is great for simple browsing. Camino has the best adblock, pop-up block, resize block features. I turn all of the security features on, bump up the minimum text size, and use Camino to relax and browse in a distraction free environment.
I still use Safari for sites that require cookies or web apps.
I use NetNewsWire for RSS. None of the browsers have good enough RSS support yet.
Over the last days I've been using version 1.1 beta.
It seems to me that it is a little faster than the current "stable" versions.
But it is very stabe too. No crash until now. Nothing to blame about it.
You may find it here:
http://beta.caminobrowser.org/
I use Camino almost all the time. It's good enough for cruising the web most of the time. It's sometimes quicker than Safari at displaying complex pages and downloading large files. That was more noticeable earlier, but it's pretty much a wash now.
Pros: Keeps Safari and Apple honest.
Cons: Doesn't support all the Mac OS X ctl-... keyboard shortcuts. For emacs and Unix geeks it is delightful to learn that ctl-t transposes mistyped characters. That works in Safari, but not in Camino.
Firefox is great and all, but the bloat really affects performance. Camino is fast and clean. Sure it's missing the nice plug-in architecture of firefox, but the speed trade-off is well worth it under most circumstances.
Page 1 of 6. 111 entries.




Fascinating bit of software - your screencaster sold me on it.