avatar jahsaidthis

Comment and replies on Transmission:

avatar

by
jah, 2006-10-13

All of the mentioned 'bugs' (bar one) have been fixed in the nightly version, and the remaining issue is in the process of being sorted out.

avatar

by
aeko, 2006-12-22 (score: 1)

Pay no attention to the comments below the first few. Transmission is great and does work on Demonoid. The bugs to my knowledge have been fixed and it's worked perfectly for me.

avatar

by
dino, 2007-02-10

So, I'm wondering when the next version is coming out. According to the website, their last release was on June 25 of 2006. That's pretty much half a year ago. And yet, all the releases before 0.6.1 didn't take as long to release. The only way that one would know that it's development is continuing is if you were to take a look at their nightly build section:
http://chucker.mystfans.com/opensource/transmission/

avatar

by
toni, 2007-02-20 (score: 4)

The new version 0.7 is in developement, and it looks good. Check out here : http://chucker.mystfans.com/opensource/transmission/Transmission-latest.dmg

avatar

by
dino, 2007-02-25 (score: 2)

Okay, so 0.7 is still in development. Why is this now called 0.7? It's not out yet!

avatar

by
varal, 2007-03-06

Transmission works fine with demonoid and other trackers. One big problem, after the download is complete, you HAVE to check the files by stopping the torrent, dragging the file of folder out of the transmission folder, restarting the torrent, stopping it again, and then dragging the original file or folder back to the tranmission folder (overwriting the new files transmission created). Then start the torrent again, transmission will now check the download again. Often, there is a error and a small portion needs to be downloaded again. It would be nice if Transmission would doublecheck the downloads before declaring them compleet!

avatar

by
groxx, 2007-03-06 (score: 5)

Been using it for quite a while in lieu of bigger, badder alternatives.
It often downloads quicker than the alternatives in my experience. Even vs Azureus. And as to it being banned on trackers, I've never come across it. I keep hearing about it, and it keeps working everywhere I need it to.
* shrug *

That said, I truly truly wish uTorrent would make a Mac build. Nothing has ever been even remotely as fast as uTorrent.

avatar

by
adc89, 2007-03-14 (score: 2)

Please contribute to the bounty for encryption.

http://transmission.m0k.org/forum/viewtopic.php?t=1067

If we get encryption in Transmission, Xtorrent will have it as well. I think that's well worth it.

avatar

by
rebrimhall, 2007-04-18 (score: 1)

0.7 is out. All I can say is wow. I shied away from using Transmission before but this release is really good.

avatar

by
bitnix, 2007-04-18 (score: 2)

Comparing this with Azureus is like trying to match a Mac with a PC wreck anno 1997.

Azureus - which disappointingly seems to be the 'de facto' standard client - is so accumulated of bloat and a mess to configure (I hear it doesn't even ship with the proper settings pre-configured for optimal efficiency).

Transmission is a Mac app.

It would be a shame not to see it being considered legitimate on trackers in general, if not to say, a horrible tragedy. But now, seeing that they've changed a whole lot in the app, and hopefully conformed to most of the general praxis, there seems to be a chance for a very welcome revival! Granted, I know that at least one of the vital trackers out there has changed their policy towards allowing Transmission once again.

avatar

by
donut2d, 2007-05-27 (score: -6) buried [Show comment]

avatar

by
ssp, 2007-06-05

Exactly the lightweight solution that prevents a torrent download from giving me the Azureus nightmare.

I think it should really create the files at their full size when downloads start, though. I saw some files being destroyed when a disk ran full because of that when I tried an eaerlier version. So: nice if you are sure your hard drive won't run full.

avatar

by
aashish13, 2007-06-22 (score: 1)

The latest nightlies have selective file downloading. Works really really well. This at least now is the hands down best torrent client for mac imho. Great work team!!

avatar

by
ian_groh, 2007-07-14

Is this, or Azureus better?

avatar

by
ericinmotion, 2007-08-03 (score: 1)

i tried azureus and xtorrent before this gem.
simple, easy, small, no crap you don't need like azureus, and no "buy this now." i'm stoked i found this app.

avatar

by
kamikazow, 2007-08-07

@ian_groh: It depends. Azureus has more features, but requires more resources. Eg Azureus supports transfer encryption. This is a feature that requires lots more CPU resources, but can result in faster transfers.
I use Transmission when I do work at the same time and I use Azureus when something downloads while I sleep.

avatar

by
boethius, 2007-08-08

I was an happy user of Transmission, and hoped for a while for the 0.8 version.
But I'm sorry to say, it's a failure : it always bug and crash, and I must restart my mac to use it after having done any little change.
Perhaps they will soon offer a 0.8.1 with bug fix ?

avatar

by
rebrimhall, 2007-08-08

@boethius:
I've never had a crash from the last two versions of Transmission. Perhaps this is something specific to your set-up?

avatar

by
rebrimhall, 2007-08-08

@boethius:
I've never had a crash from the last two versions of Transmission. Perhaps this is something specific to your set-up?

avatar

by
bifter, 2007-08-09

Now that the latest version has downloading of individual files this is the perfect bittorrent client on the mac. I find it much faster than Azureus for downloading. It uses less resources and is much more intuitive to use. Great work!

1 2 3 4 5 6 next

Page 1 of 6. 114 entries.