avatar m4c_b0ysaidthis

Comment and replies on Ping:

avatar

by
m4c_b0y, 2006-11-26

PNGCrush works a lot better for me, and it gets rid of the gamma too (http://user.fundy.net/morris/photoshop03.shtml), (http://pmt.sourceforge.net/pngcrush/)

Only problem with that is that it you have to use terminal commands. Anyone know of any automator actions to simplify it?

avatar

by
saktomo, 2006-12-16 (score: 2)

It does shrink the size of the files, but to get it to work you have to drag the PNG files onto the app file itself. That problem is very troublesome.

avatar

by
dreamcore, 2007-03-01

I already use pngcrush with contextual menu items that I made with OnMyCommand.

I'll give this a try: Ping's OptiPNG compression may have better or faster compression than pngcrush...but unless I can access Ping's options similarly, a drag and drop app probably won't be easier or more convenient.

avatar

by
marc, 2007-05-06

Re stripping the gamma (m4c_b0y), there is GammaSlamma which also uses PNGCRUSH, but yeah, it might be nice to have both features available in one app.

avatar

by
ramlal, 2007-09-24 (score: 1)

The website for this handy utility has been offline for weeks now. You can still snatch the download at MacUpdate.

avatar

by
gaffer, 2007-11-05

If you want something that does both (the crushing of Ping combined with the gamma removal of GammaSlamma), you can use the widget PNGpong. It's not a standalone unfortunately, but it still works really well so I have since switched to that (it uses both the pngcrush and the optipng "engines" already mentioned below).

Comment and replies on Deheister:

avatar

by
m4c_b0y, 2006-11-14

IMO Hubert should be the icon.

Comment and replies on aMSN:

avatar

by
m4c_b0y, 2006-11-13 (score: 1)

This is nice if you want support for video or audio via msn, but other than that Adium beats it hands down.

avatar

by
t3h, 2007-03-30 (score: 1)

Nice, but it seems to lock up very frequently, so I'd use Adium over it any day...

avatar

by
celerachan, 2007-07-03 (score: 1)

i like this. Because it can use isight for video chat. Normally, i use adium. :-)

avatar

by
thesmileyone, 2007-11-09

I use aMSN only for the isight feature - usually I much prefer Adium. Any other good messenger programs out there allow the use of iSight?

avatar

by
yossarian1985, 2008-02-13

Only reason I use it is because it can receive MSN's "Offline Messages", and even then it seems horribly slow on my MBP. Adium's still my primary IM program.

Skype does it for me wrt video-chat.