avatar marcossaidthis

Comment and replies on Airfoil:

avatar

by
marcos, 2006-07-13

It´s amazing. it just works!. I use it with Intel Mac and works!

avatar

by
bifter, 2006-08-11

I use this everyday, well worth the money. It means that i can run Internet radio from my radio widget through my stereo without any annoying cables. Perfect :)

avatar

by
solidan, 2006-10-28

This app is rediculously overpriced for what it does. $25? Come on. Bring it down to $15 maybe, and we'll have a look at it.

avatar

by
hmcnally, 2007-07-12

v2.0.8 is no longer capturing AOL Radio for me :(. Other apps work. Where's the old version at? (Capturing all system audio is a workaround.)

avatar

by
norz, 2007-10-21

There's a windows version too, I wonder if it would work with foobar2000 under Parallels or Fusion. Apparently there are some problems with foobar2000....

avatar

by
kiezpro, 2008-04-30

$25 is a lot of money, especially regarded the fact that it adds a functionality Apple should have provided in the first place. But then especially the latest version with the built-in video player does an excellent job. In fact, I've got fewer problems (none, exactly) with AirFoil than with Airtunes. Also, I got excellent, quick feedback with a working solution when AirFoil didn't work with my new Draft-N Airport Express base stations.
Even if it seems expensive at first, it does an excellent job and is well supported.

Comment and replies on SightSpeed:

avatar

by
marcos, 2006-07-13

If you enable The "beta Codec" in the optional settings you will have the most advanced video conferencing that is available. PC magazine says that this coded that is in beta right now is superb and that is much better than Skype Video (obviusly in PCs) as missing for Mac.
It works very well when you do a Mac-Pc conference. The interface is exactly the same in the PC and the Mac. This means that the interface is not very Mac like but it has the advantage that is easy to configure your mother´s sighspeed in a PC by phone.!

Comment and replies on ImageWell:

avatar

by
marcos, 2006-07-13

I love this small aplication. I was looking for a equivalent of Snagit in the PC and this application is the most similar and useful aplication I found on the Mac.
it´s really useful if you have to edit or comment images. I use it to add comments to images I later send by email.

avatar

by
opus, 2006-07-17

I use this app quite a bit when I'm resizing images for blog entries, and I don't need to do any fancy editing, balancing, etc. Quite handy...

avatar

by
neiltc13, 2006-07-19 (score: 3)

Brilliant app but it really needs a better icon.

avatar

by
chris24, 2007-01-03

its a little app! Fast, doesn't use much RAM ( CPU ), however, it only has little features. I mostly use it for uploading and watermarking my images. I am running it on Intel, and it works great! You should check this out, but i'd recommed Gimp more.

avatar

by
1xn, 2007-01-06

this is a tool and a half....

avatar

by
im_matt_i_, 2007-02-21

i like the older version, but i use this a lot at work.

avatar

by
phaty, 2007-02-25 (score: 1)

Oh yes it needs another icon!!! I so hate it when it comes up in the dock that I don't keep it there ... ! Which is kinda stupid I admit ...

avatar

by
shadownight, 2007-04-22 (score: 1)

A blogger's dream... it's a little awkward but definitely very powerful for its minimalist interface.

avatar

by
eberlin, 2007-04-24

An excellent photo editor which I use predominantly to resize images for the web. It does the simple things very well and it saves me opening up Photoshop. You can also crop, watermark, add text and edit your photos or use it as a screen grab tool.

A great timesaver and very easy to use.

avatar

by
astorg, 2007-06-12

Incredibly clever. Pity it doesn't have the Photoshop "Save for Web" command which is just about all I open Photoshop for....

And OMG, why can't they make it less ugly?

avatar

by
hansdorsch, 2007-06-16

I have used version 2 for a long time. It was an essential for me.
Version 3 spoiled the experience completely. I am still using version 2. Right now, I am testing skitch, which might become the successor to ImageWell.

avatar

by
norz, 2007-09-21

Why can't it handle a width over 2000 pixels???

avatar

by
el_cravito, 2008-04-03 (score: 1)

Unfortunately, not freeware anymore.
(Although 20 dollars is not too expensive for what it does...)
.

1 2 next

Page 1 of 2. 35 entries.