avatar meaningegosaidthis

Comments and replies on Cyberduck:

avatar

by
meaningego, 2008-03-10

It used to work, but now it's getting slower and slower and gives lot of timeout problems other clients don't have.

Probably this is a problem that is going to be solved, but by now I'm forced to look for other clients.

avatar

by
txarly, 2008-05-16 (score: 1)

My last experiences with Cyberduck were quite frustrating (timeout problems, huge load of RAM), but now I must admit the new version (cyberduck 3 3966) works like a charm.

avatar

by
bitnix, 2008-05-16 (score: 2)

Suggesting adding the tag: S3 to this entry.

avatar

by
ezhangin, 2008-05-24 (score: 1)

I want to like Cyberduck but it doesn't quite work that well for me. It seems to take forever to get the directory list from my server (served via Cerebus) when Transmit does not. Also it just seems slower connection wise as well. For example, if I am download multiple files in succession there is a far greater pause between files with Cyberduck. It might be that Cerebus likes Transmit better for some reason though.

avatar

by
rahji, 2008-06-12 (score: 2)

I used to love it, but now I'm having to buy Transmit instead. Cyberduck crashes constantly these days which is really inconvenient when i have several files open for editing. Also, if it fails while uploading a file, I end up with an empty file on the server. Yikes!

avatar

by
wak, 2008-06-30

Works great for me. I use it almost daily. I use it with Smultron and CSSEdit. Never crashes. At this point I can't see why I would pay for an FTP program.

1 2 3 next

Page 1 of 3. 44 entries.